<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://feeds.qzone.qq.com/rss.xsl" version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:qz="http://qzone.qq.com">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[ Mr A.D.W]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com</link>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:47:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Qzone</generator>
<language>zh-cn</language>
<copyright>Copyright (C), 2005-2008, Tencent Tech. Co., Ltd.</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:45:26 GMT</pubDate>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[他妈的还得再考一遍]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126</link>
<description><![CDATA[他妈的还得再考一遍GRE]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:45:26 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[向小众致敬！]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131</link>
<description><![CDATA[pconline的清风版主评了十大口袋。<br>实际，我是耿耿于怀的。作为m的铁杆，上次他旗舰里面居然没有A1，其实A1也比较牵强。然而这次没有X，颇失公正。回帖里面，我也表达了这个意思，X毕竟是小众，没有也罢。没人知道。<br>史蒂夫乔布斯果然是个牛人。它的新imac用玻璃和铝是因为“最好回收”。佩服了，然而，小众。还是小众。<br>罗技的大甲壳虫，微软的战备包实在让我觉得，鼠标业也终于见到瓶颈了。我在思考，下一站的鼠标将是什么？想象，激光真的给我们带来了什么呢?当本质的改变已经无法影响实际的使用的时候，本质的改变到底还是否有意义？或许还是小的创意，比如，加上滚轮来的实际吧。鼠标已经脱离了大众，他们服务的对象，只是雷神玩家们罢了。然而，一个普通的雷神玩家，我，是没有发觉什么的不同的。所以，鼠标这种东西，手感很重要。雷神也是小众了，大家都玩半条命去了。<br>索尼可能也是很无奈。U10/20/30/40/50/60到L1,终于停止了。卡片和对薄的追求。所以，我并不喜欢sony这种大众品味。理光更喜欢，然而画质是硬伤。很另类。另类的东西常常会受到尊重或者崇拜，理光也是如此，然而不好卖。似乎是必然的。sony似乎很聪明。然而，我是宁愿喜欢那种不好卖的另类的。所以，我尊重史蒂夫乔布斯。所以，我尊重理光。所以，我尊重R1，但是，不好卖的。<br>诺顿360卖到499元人民币，太便宜了。难道安全软件免费的日子真的入趋势所说的那样，到来了吗？<br>HP和柯达的合并我觉得很好。当然，不会像当年，hp和康柏，迈拓和希捷一样的感觉了。实际上，我认为，很不错，至少，打击下日系。既然爱国者不争气，明基也仅仅是换包装。双鸟折翼。<br>VB100很牛吗？金山我很尊敬。但是，我只是很讨厌它的毒霸。看看微点吧，小众，被尊重，是的，小众。<br>奥林巴斯怎么样？也是一个小众。<br>其实，还是觉得，最大的特色就是没有特色。看看IBM的设计吧，和苹果就是两个极端。一个以不变应万变，一个常常出其不意的变。<br>看看佳能的A系列吧，也是不变的造型，sony的T，是变造型不变核心。不过，现在的新T好多了。这个叫做“传承企业的设计风格”。是吗？看看人家IBM和苹果是怎么传承的，看看人家爱立信是怎么传承的，索尼毁掉了爱立信的工业设计精髓，他还会毁掉美能达吗？]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[GRE 报名]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5</link>
<description><![CDATA[交了钱了就安心了。给ETS作贡献了。<br>2007-09-07<br>2007-08-30<br>2007-09-21<br>1481很是贵。终于安心复习了。no choice]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[1Ds Mark III]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4</link>
<description><![CDATA[i didn't really know the news before i browsed dpreview.com <br>i got a great among of photos, and i turned to pconline and 色影无忌 to get some remarks. <br>it is not a full 135mm CMOS, instead it's a ASP-H size, with a aspect of 1.3X. what's as a return is a 10 fps of continuing shooting rate. it's  top till now. Canon make a great step beyond Nikon. i regard as a great creativity is he used a daul Digic processor which made the 10mps possible.]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:43:57 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[[转]用热工老师的照片做桌面拉~~]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3</link>
<description><![CDATA[啊哈哈哈~~~ <br>我每天都见到热工老师拉~~ <br>打开电脑就见到了呢~~~ <br>多亏随老大啊!!! <br>随老大是好男人!!! <br>热工老师好有型啊~~~ ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>12</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 06:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kodak 是这么玩的]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2</link>
<description><![CDATA[you press the botton, we do the rest. <br>Kodak give photographing to the mass. and he create a new system to produce photos. is the tranditional film. and the &quot;film&quot; and &quot;develope shop&quot; mode is a Kodak's mode. <br>this is revolutional. when photographing become widly use in common people(not just is pro level) another page is created. kodak is a company i admire. <br>for CCD, which is Kodak's another creation, say DC is not because it's covenient or cheap, what is DC's really revolutional job is this small toy bring the possibility of shotting anywhere forgetting the cost one will spend when pressing the botten. this change lead to commen people shotting anywhere, in any occation, and this make photographing popular. this is a 全民艺术运动的有利条件。]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[论Pentax 的 K10D]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1</link>
<description><![CDATA[it168.com claim that this DSLR will be the least prise in the circle of this year's DSLR product line among the 10 Mega Pixal CCD/CMOS DSLRs. <br>eventhough the K10D is not yet on the market, i really think it's a good news. say at least we have an other option. well the K10D was quite a bit advance when comparing with the same prise sony's A100, Canon's 400D and Nikon's D80. <br>But what i warry a lot is Pentax, being a Third level DSLR producer, let's review the previous products it release, we will easily find out that the producer is lack of so called technical advance. this is such a big ban between the class 3 and the class 1. the previous products are all in the beginner level. and pentax claim that his DSLR is the tidyest in the market, but as to DSLR, the size will not me the smaller the better as in the card size compatitions, Canon's 350D is too small to feel like a &quot;pro&quot; one, and holding it is not so comfortable. what will Pentax provide in the future? will it provide enough lens and accosications? there questions maybe Pentax is woddering too. <br>surely enough, Nikon will not provide a CCD anti-shake system like Sony's steady-shot(super? pro? no matter what they called), how can Nikon sell its VR lens? the same case will be in Canon's IS.  <br>all in all, K10D will be a good choice for new commers. but toward me, i have 2 nikkor lens, and a DSLR is not in my schdule, my Minolta A1 is quite enough for me. and i will not leave it before i press the bottem the 27,000 time. ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[mradw]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0</link>
<description><![CDATA[this is only a test~]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com( Mr A.D.W)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

